"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."Based on a survey conducted by their own marketing department and certain comments by some reviewers, the director made flawed reasoning and drew unconvincing conclusions about the problems responsible for their shrinking market.
The author claim Super Screen should allocate a huge share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising. His argument is not honest because super screen don't need to do more advertising of there movie. I strongly disagree with the claim and find it illogical due to the below mentioned reasons:
First argument of author is, According to recent result predict and they get higest number of viewers in last year than any other years, and also rose their reviews. however it is not mistake of Super-Screen perhaps it fold of movie theatre or it also possible when Super-screen has release their movie at simultaneously other movie production has launch movies, So Folk would like to refer other movie.
Second argument of writer is, The conents of movie reviews are not reaching ample to their prospective viewers. Therefore the problem occur not with the quality of movies but with the public's lack of awareness of that movies of good quality are available. Meanwhile, In last year Super-screen get apex review and viewers than they don't need to awareness to their upcoming movies because folk are hurried to watching their upcoming movies, So author can not claim that because of public's lack of awareness they don't get enough viewers. Moreover, Perhaps the last movie of Super-screen is lack of quality thus this time people didn't like to watch the movie.
In the whole, The author argument is flaws as per mine reasons mention the above. Super-Screen should not allocate a greater share of its budget for next year to reaching the public through adverstising. They should try to make a good quality of movies to get ample viewers.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: First argument of author is, According to recent result predict and they get higest number of viewers in last year than any other years, and also rose their reviews. however it is not mistake of Super-Screen perhaps it fold of movie theatre or it also possible when Super-screen has release their movie at simultaneously other movie production has launch movies, So Folk would like to refer other movie.
Error: higest Suggestion: highest
Sentence: Second argument of writer is, The conents of movie reviews are not reaching ample to their prospective viewers.
Error: conents Suggestion: contents
Sentence: Super-Screen should not allocate a greater share of its budget for next year to reaching the public through adverstising.
Error: adverstising Suggestion: advertising
---------------------------
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Characters: 1354 1500
No. of Different Words: 138 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.105 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.768 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.487 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 98 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.818 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.044 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.403 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.617 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
The author claim Super Screen should allocate a huge sha...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ment is not honest because super screen dont need to do more advertising of there mo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...her years, and also rose their reviews. however it is not mistake of Super-Screen perha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
...her years, and also rose their reviews. however it is not mistake of Super-Screen perha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'folds'?
Suggestion: folds
... not mistake of Super-Screen perhaps it fold of movie theatre or it also possible w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-Screen perhaps it fold of movie theatre or it also possible when Super-screen ha...
^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ing ample to their prospective viewers. Therefore the problem occur not with the quality ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n get apex review and viewers than they dont need to awareness to their upcoming mov...
^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o their upcoming movies because folk are hurried to watching their upcoming movie...
^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cause of publics lack of awareness they dont get enough viewers. Moreover, Perhaps t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s lack of quality thus this time people didnt like to watch the movie. In the whol...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is flaws as per mine reasons mention the above. Super-Screen should not allocate ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 2260.96107784 61% => OK
No of words: 280.0 441.139720559 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95714285714 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51083366918 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 204.123752495 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 705.55239521 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4093109921 57.8364921388 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.181818182 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 23.324526521 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.70786347227 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314121258795 0.218282227539 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12295244721 0.0743258471296 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064844666799 0.0701772020484 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197257195336 0.128457276422 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729455960449 0.0628817314937 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.