According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.
The arguments claims the following.
1) The number of people attending the production companies movies decreased during the past year compared to any other year.
2) Percentage of positive reviews by movie are increased so the problem is not in the movies they made but lack of the marketing of the movies.
And proposes to increase the awareness of these movies by incresing the advertisement. However, the argument lacks analytical reasoning and some of the important questions needs to be answered while presenting the plausible solution. I discuss these in my next paragraphs.
Firstly, the comparision of the number of audiance is related to different years (or different times). There must have been many changes happend in these years, either by social or econimical changes or due to the competitors. If the economy is not doing well then people will not be able to spend their money on the art or movies which are consided as luxaries. If the social view has differed with the content of the movies, then also people won't watch movies. Not only these facors but also if an other movie was released on the same time, then there is a shortage for the movie theraters and number of people attending he movie gets reduced. So the argument must answer the economic and social condition between it's comparisions and the movies relased those years.
Secondly, the percentage of reviews can not be used to determine the quality of the movie. Based on the claim by the argument, the number of people attened the movies has decreased, we can not use the percentage. To ilustrate, if there was 100 people watched a movie and 20 people gave the review and 10 people gave good review then the percetage of good reviews is 10 percent. However, if the number of audiance are increased to 200 and if the sample of reviewrs is not increased from 20 and even if 15 people gives the good reviews, the 7.5% comes short compare to the 10%. So as the percentage statistics can not be used as is, we need to have the sample details and the poputlation- total number of audiance watched as well.
Manifestly, we can say that, we need the details of the ecanomy, cometator movies, and the social situations at the time these moves released. And also we need the information about the people who reviewed to evoluate more.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
The arguments claims the following. 1 The number of people...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...argument lacks analytical reasoning and some of the important questions needs to be answere...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 496, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...vies. Not only these facors but also if an other movie was released on the same time, th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people gives the good reviews, the 7.5% comes short compare to the 10%. So as th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 401.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80049875312 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60051090147 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488778054863 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8177684935 57.8364921388 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.315789474 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27240342737 0.218282227539 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854176521906 0.0743258471296 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942915928388 0.0701772020484 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144999323699 0.128457276422 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114586930684 0.0628817314937 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 98.500998004 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
The arguments claims the following. 1 The number of people...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...argument lacks analytical reasoning and some of the important questions needs to be answere...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 496, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...vies. Not only these facors but also if an other movie was released on the same time, th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people gives the good reviews, the 7.5% comes short compare to the 10%. So as th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 401.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80049875312 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60051090147 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488778054863 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8177684935 57.8364921388 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.315789474 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27240342737 0.218282227539 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854176521906 0.0743258471296 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942915928388 0.0701772020484 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144999323699 0.128457276422 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114586930684 0.0628817314937 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 98.500998004 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.