All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Thoruh organizations are build of people, to listen to the people in an organizaion, it is not just the time and money but organizations need more expertise to understand why the problems are acutally occuring. I illustrate this in my next paragraphs.
Firstly, Companies will have their priorities which needs to be considered. Though employees are the greatest asset to any organization, companies can not deviate from their primary purpose. To illustrate, a newly started software company can not afford employees just to listen to other emplyoees. Similarly, with the large companies, the employees gets divided into different divisions -like marketing, sales, development etc. These different sections employees will have different sets of problems. Companies can not afford many people to asses the people from different divisions.
Building upon the prevous paragraph, It is not just about creating an internal team to listen the problems but also these problems needs to evoluated and solved. People tends have different problems based on their way of living or due to the way they rised. It is more of dealing with psychology. So companies can not hire psycologists and evoluate, which companies can not do. However companies like Peoplehum, Organization which provides a platform to evaluate employees and create surveys, puts a lot of money to understand how to create the survey and what things to be considered and how to evaluate when there are outlier responses.
Apart from the above financial and strategic reasons, their is a human tendency which also affects if companies does their internal review; peer backbiting or afraid of being found. To illustrate, if a manager in an organization asks his/her employees about the problems with organizaion culture, no one would say their problems because they are afraid of becoming noticed. But if we see reviews on websites like Glassdoor, we find most genuine reviews. However, the leaders in the market maintains a good relationship with their employees and they can get the issues an employee facing. But this kind of genuinity is very less.
Manifestly, to save the money and the to care more about their primary business, organizations tend to use third party. Moreover, people are cannot open up directly infront of their managers or peers as it they feel it could give wrong impression. So it is better to have a third party to handle the issues efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 379, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d evoluate, which companies can not do. However companies like Peoplehum, Organization ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 55, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... above financial and strategic reasons, their is a human tendency which also affects ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, third, apart from, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23155216285 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85955280768 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534351145038 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.5744809936 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9047619048 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190021289063 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583565703749 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517686911237 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103365909912 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400385152463 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.