Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The immediate problems always look more important to people than the problems that are anticipated in the future. But it is the responsibility of the govenments to take right decisions than taking decisions hastly. Also the severeness of the problem defines the action or focus needs to be provided than the mere outlook of it.
I present these in my next paragraphs.
Firstly, How we define if an immediate problems is always a greater concern the problem anticipated. If the problem immediate because of political or industrial pressure rather than the actual need then it is not going to solve the problem rather just makes the government to lose its valuable resources on the unnecessary projects. To illustrate, if a bridge to a village of 100 people is expected because of a visit of a political or industrially eminent person wants to visit the village, but there is not other use to it. However, we know some times these can be manipulated in the media as a severe issues and pretened to cause chaos unless it is done. To overcome, these isses government needs to consider the actual need and it can be done by appointing a committe which can do a cost benefit analysis and find if it is really needed. Unless we do a thorough cost benifit analysis we won't know if the project is really needed.
Secondly, Though there are genuine immediate issues but if the costs occur in solving the issue does not compell with the current budget then it is the responsibility of government to take a strong stand and take a decision. To provide context, if there are consecutive earthquakes occurred in a place and there is a very low probability for an other earthquake to occur. If government plans to build a earthquack detection centre at that place then it is not going to cause any use later on but causing a huge economic burden on the government. But if it is anitcipated that there are frequent earthquakes occur in a place then building an instiution to study these will be greater use to the government both economically and socially.
In contrast to the above, it is not always possible to anticipate a problem accurately. So governments need to be aware of the possibilities of the occurance of these problems a take a decison. Likewise, problems with insignificant econimical benifit but social benefit needs to be taken care even if thery are not going to provide any returns. For example, a school at a village with a considerable children popluation. Though there are no immdiate benifits or we can not assume it could produce noble prize winneres, it will definitely help to increase the literacy rate and improve the standard of people with adequate educatin and its applicaitons by the students.
Manifestly, From the above it is important for the government to take compelling decisions based on the social and econimic viability rather than any of the external forces or issues with greater burden on the budget but very low outcomes. Even if some problems does not yield much of economical benefits, based on the social need governments needs to take a responsible decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...decisions than taking decisions hastly. Also the severeness of the problem defines t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
... Firstly, How we define if an immediate problems is always a greater concern the problem...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 343, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...and there is a very low probability for an other earthquake to occur. If government plan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 402, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... to occur. If government plans to build a earthquack detection centre at that pla...
^
Line 15, column 401, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'child'?
Suggestion: child
...school at a village with a considerable children popluation. Though there are no immdiat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 286, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...if some problems does not yield much of economical benefits, based on the social need gove...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, look, really, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2585.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.868173258 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88161932747 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442561205273 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 861.3 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.711849705 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.095238095 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212213515541 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674182104942 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673562065078 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10622322822 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647650626171 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.