The pie-graph illustrates how much money that the average family spent at restaurants in four different years representing in a percentage. The other graph provides information about the number of meals that people had in sit-down and fast food restaurants.
Overall, the percentage of the budget to spend on restaurant meals increased yearly, while the percentage of the other type declined. Moreover, the majority of the family spent their time eating in fast food restaurants between 1970 to 1980, after that period the number of meals at sitdown restaurant become greater.
Looking first at the pie chart, accounting for 90 %, the percentage of food budget spending on restaurant meals was nine times higher than home cooking in 1980. However, there was a jump for the budget of home cooing by 5, 20 and 15 % in 1980, 1998 and 2000 respectively. Ultimately, it covered exactly half of the area in the graph in 2000.
Turning to the line-graph, before intersecting with the number of meals having at sitdown restaurant at about 35 meals in 1980, the number of meals eating at fast food restaurants was almost 20 meals. It then leaped by more than three-fold standing over the number of meals consuming at sit-down restaurants by about 50 meals in 2000 (fast food meals at 90 meals and sitdown restaurant at 50 %).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s at sitdown restaurant become greater. Looking first at the pie chart, accounti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98642533937 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74791200881 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511312217195 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6441953701 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46982381356 0.215688989381 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20472306644 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107345576333 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303140067537 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086128087016 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.