The given pie charts and line graphs provide information on how much the average family expended on food over 3 decades from 1970 to 2000. The pie charts illustrate the proportion of budget spent on restaurant meals, while the line graph describes the trend of the number of meals taken in fast food and sit-down restaurants over the given period.
Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of the family budget on food cooked in the home is increasingly dropping over the years with an increase in the number of fast-food meals and a slight decline in food eaten in the sit-down restaurants.
It is clear from the pie charts is that there was a yearly increase in the budget on restaurant meals as compared to home cooking. In 1970, an average family spent about one-tenth of the income on food bought in the restaurants and there was an increase of about 5% in the following decade to 15% in 1980. This trend continued into the following decades to reach 35% in 1990 and by the year 2000, families had spent half of their budget on food bought in the restaurant.
Noticeably, the line graph showed that the number of meals eaten per year in fast-food restaurants increased slightly in the first 10 years from about 20 meals per year in 1970 to just below 30 in 1980. Furthermore, there was a subsequent drastic increase in the trend in the following two decades to reach about 80 meals per annum for fast food meals. While, on the other hand, sit-down restaurant food purchase increased slightly over the given 30-year period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...slightly over the given 30-year period.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69003690037 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49764530112 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435424354244 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7124817819 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.222222222 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383832068642 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181755238604 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782783110048 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261793593038 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034362219887 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.