The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014.

The given pie charts reveal the change in the rate of volunteers by six different organizations consist of Environmental, Educational, Sport, Health Care, Art and Others in 2008 and 2014.

Overall, it is evident that the percentage of volunteers by educational organization was the highest point in 2008, the opposite was true for the figure of people wo worked in environmental organization in 2014. Both 2 years including 2008 and 2014, the proportions of volunteers by health care organization saw the lowest percent.

Looking at the pie chart in 2008, the figure for people who worked by educational organization was the biggest percent, followed by the rate of volunteers by environmental organization, was 24 percent and 21 percent respectively. Both art organization and others organization witnessed the same level, stood at exactly 15 percent.

On the other hand, in 2014, the percentage of volunteers by educational organization significantly declined of 6 percent. By contrast, the proportion of people who worked by environmental organization steadily rose, from 26 percent in 2008 to 29 percent in 2014. While the rate of volunteers by sport organization saw a sharp increase, up to 10 percent during 5 years, the figure for volunteers by others organization dropped from 15 percent in 2008 to 9 percent in 2014. Just only 8 percent was seen the lowest point in the proportion of volunteers by health care organization.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...g 5 years, the figure for volunteers by others organization dropped from 15 percent in...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26956521739 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33957198168 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452173913043 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6945010677 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35194207597 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19476939624 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799313992279 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262945420934 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662912517537 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.