The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line graph reveals the change in how many people who traveled Caribbean island over the period from 2010 to 2017. Overall, it is crystal clear that the total number of visitors staying Caribbean island saw remark upward trend. In addition, both the numbers of people who staying on cruise ships and island still significantly increased.
In 2010, three categories in the line graph witnessed low starting point, with 1 million in the total number of visitors, approximately 0.75 million was the number of visitors staying on island. The opposite was true for the figure of people traveling cruise ships was just only under 0.5 million, which exactly 0.25 million. Besides, on the period, the data of tourists who stayed on island in 2011 and 2013 were identical, at 0.5 million. Similarly, the figure for people visiting cruise ships has the same level, stood at 1,5 million both in three years including 2013, 2014 and 2015.
The total number of tourists travelling experienced an upward trend, starting the period at 1 million and finishing at 3.5 millions. This was a massive 2-fold increase, compared with the figure for visitors staying on island. In 2017, how many tourists visiting on cruise ships accounted for 2 millions, which was far higher 0.5 million than the number of people who stayed island and lower 1.5 millions than the total number of visitors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, similarly, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01746724891 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41704536036 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519650655022 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5754015699 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.9 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222148169262 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104668472941 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067814288793 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179032593983 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511002611152 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.