The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two period. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given table reveals the change in how many tourists to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts give information about the overcome of surveys when asking people who went to this Museum how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Overall, it is crystal clear that the first table shows the figure for visitors went to Ashdown Museum during the year after refurbishment reaches a peak. The bar charts illustrate sharply drop in the percentage of dissatisfied in the year from before to after refurbishment.
Looking at the table, 92.000 people witnesses the highest number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year after refurbished, higher than how many visitors during the year before refurbished at 18000 people.
The bar charts have the change in the result of surveys of tourists satisfaction. Before refurbishment, people have dissatisfied point, stand at 40 percent but after refurbishment, this number is changed for the opinion that is very dissatisfied. The opposite was true for the percentage of dissatisfied significantly decreases, from 40 percent at year before refurbishment to 15 percent at year after refurbishment. Visitors who accepted with very satisfied sharply declines from 15 percent to 5 percent. On the other hand, there is no change with the proportion of no response, still at 5 percent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20353982301 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93959869784 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473451327434 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5146886943 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486465432995 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189383388457 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124320749559 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330777563696 0.15604864568 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120324551169 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.