The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given tables reveal the change in sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in two years 1999 and 2004 in five different Europe countries.
Overall, it is evident that the first table shown the number of coffee which was paid in five Europe areas. In addition, this table experienced an upward trend. Similarly, while the figures for three countries consist of Switzerland, UK and Belgium on bananas followed a fairly similar pattern with the first table, in 2004, the numbers of sales of Fairtrade-labelled bananas in Sweden and Denmark were significantly decreased.
Looking at the first table about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee, the biggest rise was seen in the number of coffee in United Kingdom, from 1.5 million euros to 20 million euros. This was a massive nearly 19-fold increase. Besides, the remaining two countries spend euros on coffee also rose slightly, including Switzerland, Belgium with increased 3 million euros and 0.7 million euros respectively. Additionally, the figures for money spent on coffee in Denmark and Sweden were identical, at rose 0.2 million euros each.
On the other hand, the table about sales of Fairtrade-labelled bananas (1999 and 2004) gave information that the figure for sales bananas in Switzerland represented 32 million euros which was rose in 2004 compared to this number in 1999. By contrast, the numbers of bananas was paid in Sweden and Denmark decreased quite considerably, dropping by 0.8 million euros and 1.1 million euros respectively by 2004. UK figure and Belgium sales spiked to 5.5 million euros and 4 million euros in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'decreased'.
Suggestion: decreased
...n Sweden and Denmark were significantly decrease. Looking at the first table about s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, look, similarly, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31914893617 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13803749371 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514893617021 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.076339522 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.636363636 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231010255211 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926099183582 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948727064757 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171527540351 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691055977331 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.