Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
These days, public debale has been going on over whether some people suppose that paying money in order to developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. Despite all the drawbacks, having more benefits ways to save this money have to offer, I tend to believe that the money is used to good without the way for growth the modern machine.
Spending money to invest in developing the technology for space exploration has a wealth of disadvantage. To start with, the technology has significantly growth. It is well-know that we could be slower than the put up of modern technology, there by when we had a new phone of Apple brand, the next time, after approximately three or four months, this brand could bring new collection, which the instrument has the higher outlook and chips more than the old collection. As the result, we can not followed by the last version. The second drawback is that if we explore for space, we need a lot of money, which the passion number we must saved more time to have. As a matter of fact, the economic of one country have decided for invest to developing the technology for the major that research about space. For instance, Viet Nam is not a rich area where has a vigorous economy, if growing the technology for space exploration, the resident could face to face with the difficult of poor. With the average income of each person just only under 20 billion Vietnam coins per month, we could not do this act.
On the other hand, it would be some more beneficial ways to spend this money that people thought. The first point with respect to one of ways is the government have invested for some serious difficulty regions. In addition, the South in Vietnam witnessed two regions such as Dong Nai and Binh Duong that have problems about the life of residents. Sometimes, people living here have not had clean water in order attend to the agriculture that the fact is the number of drought soil in kilometers increase, following the time, with 200 kilometers and 700 kilometers respectively in 2001 and 2006. The other ways is money should be spend for some project that could have a whole range of possibility for education. Absolutely, education raise as level of intelligent in our head also grow. In Tay Bac mountain of Vietnam, the children is not had a new school, which the house has enough structure for teaching and learning. Clearly, the government should take care of it more than spent money in developing the technology for space exploration.
On the basic the advantages and disadvantages, I consider that we have more beneficial ways to spend money for some useful actions. Accordingly, it would be adviseable for people to look into the fact of themselves and decide in the good ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'follow'
Suggestion: follow
...d collection. As the result, we can not followed by the last version. The second drawbac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 630, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...2006. The other ways is money should be spend for some project that could have a whol...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, if, look, second, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, to start with, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2277.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 478.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76359832636 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62603305653 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512552301255 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 706.5 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4587675204 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.85 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376327064879 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129678388379 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115983374357 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262119888924 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438132310495 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.