The important way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills.
To what extent you agree or disagree
Theses day, public debate has been going on over whether educating people who own youth criminal parents with their experiences is one of the essential ways to decrease crimes. I fully agree with this measure.
To begin with, one of the reasons which make youngers have become criminals is the quality and the quantity of education for their parents have not cared. Besides, without a variety of courses in school, youth people also were learned more experiences, skills and were impacted habits, actions from their guardians. If birth parents have shown negative habits, their children would have done some acts like that. A good example is that when parents swindle to order to steal private information accounts to extort money, their sons or daughters will play to similar acts. Researchers argued that approximately 60 percent of impacts from guardians have given a critical attitude and a pessimistic view to youngers.
On the other hand, anyone lives in their countries that must keep to the legal of the areas. When guardians have educated and broadened their bits of knowledge, they would teach their children to do correctly acts. Nowadays, the proportion of youth crimes increases quite significantly, to nearly from seven to ten percent each year, followed details in The New York Times. By means, parents were educated parental training, for instance, teaching skills, legal experiences, communication training,... they have taught and explained for youngers. From that, youth criminals would not become that concerned with families.
In conclusion, I strongly assume that a good way to reduce youth crimes is to rise people skills who own parents of criminals. What are more, governments, the ministry of education and individuals must join hands to develop a society where residents could live in without the worry of crimes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stealing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: stealing
...e is that when parents swindle to order to steal private information accounts to extort ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...egal experiences, communication training,... they have taught and explained for yo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, of course, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27118644068 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64788077957 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5015197691 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335351508901 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102708552224 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730172138523 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213674200563 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320460967712 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.