The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the information about the terms of proportion of water which expand by six various parts of the globe for several aims.
In overall, husbandry makes up a major for spending water since least amount of water uses on household works. However, there are lots of transformation can be notice in all sectors for expanding water.
It can be seen from the information that Central Asia (88%) are most popular for thrift water on farming followed by Africa (84%), South East Asia (81%) and South America (81%). On the other hand, the North America and Europe utilise the lowest number of water on agriculture which accounted at a little less than a two-fifth (39%) as well as approximately a third (32%).
The charts further prove that over a half (53%) amount of water used on industrial sectors in Europe as well as 48% in North America. Likewise, Central Asia accounted for 5% of water spending on factories and experienced a two-fold rise to one in ten in South America. Similarly, a disparity of 5% can be observed in proportion of water which expand South East Asia (12%) and Africa (7%) on industrial use. Even though, the percentage of water utilities on household chores are found a fifth (19%), 15%, 13% and 9% respectively in South America, Europe, North America and Africa. Lastly, water which thrift Central Asia and South East Asia for domestic purposes remained constant at 7%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, likewise, similarly, so, third, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83402489627 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59591243785 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547717842324 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5661969147 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167872702885 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796036061394 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401232204571 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120978971287 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372196189416 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.