The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. Summarie the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts depict the information about the proportion of water utilised for various purposes in six continents of the world.
Overall, the data shows that the maximum consumption of water is in agricultural activities in Central Asia, whereas, the least amount of water is consumed in industrial purpose.
Similarly, areas namely Africa and South East Asia utilise water mainly for agricultural purposes where it contributes a significantly large part as compared to other activities. The water consumed by Africa for industrial use accounts for a total of 7% , while, South East Asia witnessed a trend up to 12% for the consumption of water. Moreover, the least consumption of water is for domestic purposes in South East Asia, whereas, there is a minor increment in the figures for the similar use in Africa.
Furthermore, North America and Europe utilise majority of water for industrial purpose, whereas, South America consumes water mainly for agricultural use. The requirement of water in domestic cores is significantly low in these three continents. The proportion of agricultural use in North America and Europe are to some extent equal. Also, the consumption of water for industrial use accounts for the minority in South America.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ndustrial use accounts for a total of 7% , while, South East Asia witnessed a tren...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97977662089 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489898989899 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8405246875 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255216115185 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12793658208 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639149967794 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171840723777 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632186728697 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.