The charts below show the proportion of British student at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given pie charts depict the percentage of British pupils at one university who apart from English dominated to speak other languages in 2000 and 2010.
Overall, the proportion of British students who knew two or more language increase in 2010 compared with 2000. In addition for both years, the percentage of students who were able to speak Spanish were more than others.
In 2000, one fifth of student did not know any language except English, this proportion decreased in 2010, and just 10% of students were one-lingual. The proportion of student who spoke German, in addition to English, was the same for both years (10%). In addition, bilingual students who could speak Spanish, increased from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010.
The percentage of pupils at university, who had ability of speaking another language and French only were identical in 2000, but, in 2010, proportion of another language experienced a 5% increase to 20% and French only percentage decrease from 15% to 10%. Moreover, the proportion of trilingual student also increased by 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...increase in 2010 compared with 2000. In addition for both years, the percentage of stude...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010. The percentage of pupils at university, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05142857143 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66082080324 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7934417471 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408047994667 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196035489198 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727783128685 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276869552238 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621721942346 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.