Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
There are two different approach about penalizing of crime. Some people agree to be a specific fine for different type of offence and others, like me, say we should consider many other condition during criminal activity such as motivation.
Fixed penalty for crime due to its type is an attitude and some populace emphasize on it. Additionally they think every person should know the eventual of his work, in other word if people realized the punishment of offence rarely would they commit crime unless accept its fine. In addition this approach believe on fairness furthermore they say every person regardless his/her situation should be considered equally in front of law. So that special penalty could fulfil the fairness.
Conversely, we emphasize on fair judgment while, all condition should be considered fairly. Sometimes people commit a crime inevitably. Although never do robbery know honestly, people who is forced to do shoplifting because of starving is not entitled to judge as a person who do it for recreation. In addition people who commit a crime deliberately are not similar to ones who offend unintentionally. So that we believe everybody who is charged with a specific crime is just an accused and court should impartially give him/his enough time to defend. Also never should we forget, stimulus of doing a work has a great part in punishing.
On the whole although some people have belief on introduced fine and penalty for certain criminal act, I think stimulus of committing an offence should be considered during the judgment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...tude and some populace emphasize on it. Additionally they think every person should know the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 283, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...commit crime unless accept its fine. In addition this approach believe on fairness furth...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 435, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... be considered equally in front of law. So that special penalty could fulfil the fairne...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...s a person who do it for recreation. In addition people who commit a crime deliberately ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...lly give him/his enough time to defend. Also never should we forget, stimulus of doi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g a work has a great part in punishing. On the whole although some people have b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, honestly, if, so, while, i think, in addition, such as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12992125984 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75976389073 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574803149606 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2532868047 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.230769231 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341648274064 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120904713043 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719648316071 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213912962887 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305998998256 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.