The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied cyclic chart delineates the information about, additional languages to english spoken by British students of particular university, in the year 2000 and 2010. The data is calibrated in per centum.
Overall, it is evident that, Spanish was the only language which was spoken by maximum number of students, whereas German was the common language spoken by minimum students during the year 2000 and 2010.
To begin with, it is seen that, In the year 2000, most commonly spoken language was Spanish, while the least spoken languages were german and two other languages with 10 percentage only. Further more, another language and French were the languages with 15 percentage and 20 percentage proportion was covered with no other language.
Probing ahead, In the year 2010, it is noticed that, most favourable language was again Spanish with 5 percentage more than the year 2000. Moreover, no other language, french and german covered 10 percentage ratio which was half less than the ratio of another language. Similarly, two other languages were spoken by 15 percentage students in the university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudents during the year 2000 and 2010. To begin with, it is seen that, In the y...
^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'ratio' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'ratios'.
Suggestion: ratios
...french and german covered 10 percentage ratio which was half less than the ratio of a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, similarly, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30337078652 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58204594116 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6359556047 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182276030731 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100007182942 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761266466743 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138180235981 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553737012732 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.