The charts below show the proportion of people's spending on different commodities and services in particular European country in 1958 and in 2008.
The given illustrates provides the percentage of people’s expenditure on various goods and services in one country in Europe in the two particular years, namely 1958 and 2008.
It is clear that the proportion of income that people spent on clothing was highest in 1958. Besides, there was a change after 50 years when people showed their preference for housing rather than other types of commodities and services in 2008.
In 1958, the number of people’s spending on clothing was nearly a third, about 33% while people's expenditure had the lowest percentage in food, just 8%. In 2008, the percentage of spending on housing was highest and was twice bigger than that on entertainment, about 32% and 16%. In addition to, most people don’t like spending in traveling in 2008, just 6%.
The was an increase from 22% to 32% in the proportion of people’s spending on housing between 1958 and 2008 while the opposite was true for clothing over the period of 50 years, about 32% in 1958 and 12% in 2008. Furthermore, the number of people’s expenditure accounted 18% on entertainment and 13% on travel in 1958 before dropping by 16% on entertainment and 6% on travel in 2008. On opposite site, the figure of people’s spending on food and luxury good had the same stable in 2008, about 17% after climb from 8% on food and 7 % on luxury goods in 1958.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...at on entertainment, about 32% and 16%. In addition to, most people don’t like spe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76595744681 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69300913295 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5270828514 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325261516024 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148191938893 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464779140612 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215183812082 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024916792848 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.