The charts below show the proportions of british students at one one university in england who were able to speak other languages in addition to english, in 2000 and 2010. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrates the percentage of british pupils at the England's university, who can use other languages as well as english. It depicts the proportion in the years 2000 and 2010.
Overall, the major percentage of british students, who have more linguistic skills decreased. While four criteria were the least part of the fraction, only two saw an increase. It seems that no longer students discontinued to learn other languages.
With regards to undergraduates at the one university of England, which were able to talk two additional languages and german solely, there was no changes, the part remained at the same 10%. The fraction of those, who have linguistic skills of French and in general only speak english, was the smallest segment in the next 10 years of 2000, declining from 15 to 10% and from 20 to the 10%, respectively.
In contrast, the segment of pupils, which know another language, increased by 5 percent in the annum 2010; meanwhile spanish spoken undergraduates made up the biggest part of the chart, as we seen a magnification from 30 to 35% in the next decade.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The charts illustrates the percentage of british pupils at the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proportion in the years 2000 and 2010. Overall, the major percentage of british...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... discontinued to learn other languages. With regards to undergraduates at the on...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% and from 20 to the 10%, respectively. In contrast, the segment of pupils, whic...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 193, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'saw'?
Suggestion: saw
...up the biggest part of the chart, as we seen a magnification from 30 to 35% in the n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, while, in contrast, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01630434783 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8725075495 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8209960116 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265186902062 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107652577107 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772882927959 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150062872173 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967527822106 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.