In the modern world, many employees lack soft skills such as communication and working in teams.
What are the main causes of this problem? What are the effects of lack of such skills?
Nowadays many employees do not have essential soft skills, suchlike easily communicate with each other and team building. I believe, that the main causes are narrow education system and the only one process of recruiting, but the effects of lack of such experiences can also produce effects.
At the beginning, while most of education system in diverse countries include only curriculum for academic purposes, enlarging pupils' knowledge, students suffer from lack of soft skills. As a result, a major part of children really care only about their grades and could be lovely and even have social phobia. But we all understand that this does not respond to our demands. The second important cause for lack of social skills is the operation of recruiting, suchlike interviews, which do not detect all abilities of future employees. To give an example, person can have a huge knowledge and make the work properly, but never participates in team brainstorms and help others.
The major effect of the first problem could be that workers do not hear each other and simply do not want to coöperate, only doing their job and seeing the one side situation. However, not many of them understand, that communication is also an important part of their job and that they could be simply replaced by computers.
Although however, not only education system influence on low quality of co-working, but also the process of hiring. A lot of employers have lost good employees only due to inappropriate way of recruiting. To solve this, the process can include a few stages, suchlike working in team, by giving difficult situations for future employees, which they should complete together. But without such abilities, workers might be confused in working in pairs, have a partnership with other companies and even can do not have spare themes to talk about at the lunch time.
To sum up, nowadays soft skills are becoming more and more important, and maybe in the future they will be even more essential, than ability to do work properly. If people were not able to talk and were not emotionally aware, they would lose all their jobs. Because now we have a big digital progress, which already have replaced many employers to artificial intelligence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h experiences can also produce effects. At the beginning, while most of educat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es in team brainstorms and help others. The major effect of the first problem co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could be simply replaced by computers. Although however, not only education sys...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 561, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...themes to talk about at the lunch time. To sum up, nowadays soft skills are beco...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould lose all their jobs. Because now we have a big digital progress, which alrea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, while, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05376344086 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6850627179 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543010752688 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6733772406 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172425090113 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530781910797 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484715374114 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103058916617 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619159214208 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.