The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
Given the comparison of two pie charts which illustrates the reason why people wander to work by bicycle or by car.
Observing the given data elaborately, the main reason which conquer 60% of graph by its sum is its health benefits and the small number of population who go by bicycle. On the other hand, people who drive car are attracted to its convenience, thus those people formed 40% of chart. In addition, distances between their home and work can be a reason why they choose car over bicycle, and those kind of reason make the 21% of chart.
Moreover, since you do not have a car you will not suffer where to park it and this reason makes the small minority of chart. By driving to work, meanwhile, you are able to carry your urgent needs to work and it is easier comparing to cycling, hence, this reason makes the 14% of chart. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that when people who ride a bicycle to work think that cycling is faster, people who drive to work consider their car as the fastest vehicle. Therefore, this kind of reason make the 12% and 14%, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...n why they choose car over bicycle, and those kind of reason make the 21% of chart. More...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...refore, this kind of reason make the 12% and 14%, respectively.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51269035533 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41950468846 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56345177665 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5649298423 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.125 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398103129217 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184486534847 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115849773968 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317792912975 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775625140484 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.