The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.Summarise the information by selecting and r

Given graphs depict the outcomes of a survey on grown-ups education. while the bar chart illustrates why adults pursue further education; the slices of the pie diagram displays how their course fees should be shared.

Overall 40% of the populace surveyed are of the opinion that an adult choose to study due to their interest in the subject, whereas 9% assume that it might be to be introduce to new people. On assessing as to how the expenditure of each course should be shared the pie diagram clearly shows that 40% are of the notion that an individual should pay it out of one's own pocket, whilst surprisingly 25% presume that the tax payers should share the cost for adult education.

Suffice to say the public's thoughts on the various other reasons as to why an adult decides to study are gain qualifications (38%), aid the current job (22%), enhance promotion (20%), aid in their satisfaction to study (20%), and be able to change jobs (12%) respectively; wherein, 35% of the people feel that its only just for an employer to share the cost an employee's education.

In summary, majority of the population surveyed (40%) were of the same opine as to the reason why grown ups opt-in to study; one's own interest in the subject, and as to who should contribute to the price of the adult education, which revealed the individuals themselves.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...st for an employer to share the cost an employees education. In summary, majority of t...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, so, whereas, while, as to, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5770609319 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4927432867 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491039426523 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 46.0 22.4926829268 205% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.2499627644 43.030603864 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 212.833333333 112.824112599 189% => OK
Words per sentence: 46.5 22.9334400587 203% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344456374595 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173582338359 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065746166349 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201340665172 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680497125725 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.4 13.2329268293 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.71 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.3012195122 183% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.4 10.9970731707 186% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.