The two charts show the outcomes of a research regarding education of adults. While the bar chart depicts the purposes of attending courses, the pie chart illustrates people’s perceptive for the cost ratio of each course.
As can be seen from the bar chart, the majority of adults persuade education due to their interest on the subject. They accounted for 40% of the total feedbacks, followed by those who want to receive more qualification (38%). In contrast, adults who learn in order to change their job and those who want to meet new people made up the least amount of votes with 12% and 9% respectively. Additionally, 22% of the total adults find that continue to study will help their current job. Moreover, both aspects that contributed 20% of the votes are “improving chances of promotion” and “enjoy studying”.
According to the pie chart, individuals that wish to study should the most for each course with 40%. Whereas, taxpayers and employer, in people’s perspective, should be less with 25% and 35% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of votes with 12% and 9% respectively. Additionally, 22% of the total adults fi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17441860465 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1238356403 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1970015853 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24583676283 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102566251305 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733567308293 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17523842442 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688386069318 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.