The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The table depicts the usage of six different transportation methods in Shanghai in 1990, and the prediction for their use 24 years later in 2020. Overall, the percentages of passenger for most transportation are predicted to decline dramatically, whereas train and car will likely to see a positive trend.
According to the table, bus was the most frequented transportation in 1996 with 39% of the total of passenger kilometers, however this figure will possibly decrease to 22% in 2020. Likewise, scooter is expected to fall sharply from 12% to 7% during the same time period. Interestingly, non-motorized modes of transport are projected to bottom out at 3%, although both walking and bicycle were recorded at 7% and 27% respectively in the past.
In contrast, it is anticipated that car will be the highest contributing transportation method with 52% in 2020, more than tripled its given percentage in 1996 (15%). A similar pattern can be seen for train, which did not operate in the past but forecast to be responsible for 13% of the total usage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03428571429 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09926126814 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674285714286 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2784983581 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209412340652 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875201265871 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731783091227 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133739994605 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529618604987 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.