The charts below show UK and USA energy comsumption in 2000 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphics show the energy consumption of 2000 and 2006 in UK and USA. Bodily, there was escalation and regression from both of them.
In 2000, United Kingdom had consumed the gumption of oil, coal, gas, nuclear p, other renewable sources. Sequently, these countries consumed for 27%, 29%, 20%, 14%, and 9%. Whereas, in U.S.A which got distinction midst of powers. Chronologically, all of its stood at 37%, 34%, 14%, 5% and 4%.
In 2006, UK there few force dominated such as oil and gas which had 30% and 38%. Over there, the coal, nuclear and other under it finish at 14%, 8%, and 10%. Switch to USA, there some drop and increase usage as well as oil in first position of 40%, and other obtained the lowest for 3% compared to coal, gas, and nuclear which derived of 25%, 25% and 5%.
In conclusion, United Kingdom and United State had the highest consumption was in premier year and contrast to last season. The most produced of pep achieved by oil and gas from second of times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...onsumed for 27%, 29%, 20%, 14%, and 9%. Whereas, in U.S.A which got distinction midst o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... 29%, 20%, 14%, and 9%. Whereas, in U.S.A which got distinction midst of powers. ...
^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun force seems to be countable; consider using: 'few forces'.
Suggestion: few forces
...%, 14%, 5% and 4%. In 2006, UK there few force dominated such as oil and gas which had...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59550561798 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38718435829 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623595505618 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8619085209 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3636363636 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1818181818 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0891399945808 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397838423018 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087758315278 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691570085972 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831184079649 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.