The climograph below shows the average monthly temperatures and rainfall the city of Kolkata.
The Pie Charts below show the comparison if different kinds of energy production of Frqnce in two year.
This graph illustrates the Comparison of kinds of energy production of france in two years among 1995 and 2005. The miscellaneous of energy production are gas, coal, petro, nuclear and other.
From the pie chart of 1995, the highest production is coal was 29.80%, in 2005 up to 1.13% and produced 30.93%. For gas which rises up to 0.68%, previously produced was 29.63% in 1995 and increased to 30.31% in 2005. How about petro?, petro had declined considerably in 2005 compared to 1995, derivation up to 9.72%. From 29.27% down to 19.55%. nuclear produced was 6.40% and go up to 10.10%, nuclear was enhancement up to 3.7%. Last one, other had reduction up to 4.2% from 4.90% decreased to 10.10%
In conclusion, of these ratio of energy production among 1995 and 2005 had significant uplift and deflation. coal, gas, nuclear and other had step-up production then year before. Only petro had a lot of drop from the previous year. Basically, the energy of production of france had big advanced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nuclear
...p to 9.72%. From 29.27% down to 19.55%. nuclear produced was 6.40% and go up to 10.10%,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this ratio' or 'these ratios'?
Suggestion: this ratio; these ratios
...ecreased to 10.10% In conclusion, of these ratio of energy production among 1995 and 200...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Coal
...5 had significant uplift and deflation. coal, gas, nuclear and other had step-up pro...
^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun drop seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of drops'.
Suggestion: a lot of drops
...uction then year before. Only petro had a lot of drop from the previous year. Basically, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91124260355 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64385160935 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.792731704 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4545454545 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3636363636 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102503150482 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526831633277 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056822361295 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105577482535 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692383988464 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.