The charts below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The bar graph illustrates the information about the proportion of men, women and children who consumed five servings of fruits and vegetables in every day in 8 years during 2001 and 2008 in the UK.
In overall, it can be seen from the information that in British the highest percentage of all people who eating fruits and vegetables was women, while, the children remained relatively lowest proportion who ate five portions of food. Furthermore, an increased can be observed in percentage of all masses who consumed these five food items over the period.
With regards to the amount of the British women who ate five servings of food items noticed just over a fifth from 2001. Similarly, percentage of women rose steadily and reached to peak at almost more than a third (35%) in both 2006 and 2007. In contrast, it started dropping and accounted at 30% at end of the period.
The figure further proves that an amount of men and children who consumed five portions of fruits and vegetables remained consistently stable in 2001 and 2003 ( 17% and 15% respectively ) in the UK. In addition to this, the amount of men who ate these five types food an increased gradually to peak at about over a quarter ( 28% ) from 2006 to 2007, where, it started declined in the last year. Interestingly, the percentage of children who was eating five servings of fruits and vegetables remained unchanged at a quarter between 2006 and 2008 and observed a higher at about 27% during 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in everyday'?
Suggestion: in everyday
... five servings of fruits and vegetables in every day in 8 years during 2001 and 2008 in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'relatively the lowest'.
Suggestion: relatively the lowest
...was women, while, the children remained relatively lowest proportion who ate five portions of foo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned consistently stable in 2001 and 2003 17% and 15% respectively in the UK. In ...
^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2001 and 2003 17% and 15% respectively in the UK. In addition to this, the amou...
^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...radually to peak at about over a quarter 28% from 2006 to 2007, where, it starte...
^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly to peak at about over a quarter 28% from 2006 to 2007, where, it started dec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, similarly, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76771653543 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6381478199 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448818897638 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.9617137367 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.555555556 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341422033079 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1506332233 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09460950759 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22445794209 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613941092142 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.