The charts below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The bar chart illustrates the amount (in percentage) of people who consumed five portions of fruit and vegetables per day over a period 8 years spanning from 2001 to 2008 in the UK.
Overall, women always had the largest share in all those years, with men being in the 2nd place and children having the lowest share. The year with the highest percentage of people was 2006, whereas, the lowest percentage was seen in the year 2001.
The chart shows that the total percentage of people who consumed fruits and vegetables increased over time from 2001 to 2006. From 2001 to 2003, there was only minimal increase in the percentage of men (17%, 17% and 18% in those 3 years) and children (12%,12% and 13% in 2001,2002 and 2003 respectively). These numbers increased more rapidly in the following 3 years. The percentage of women followed a more incremental manner.
After 2006, the next two years showed that the percentage of women and men decreased. children percentage saw a rise till 2007 but followed the same pattern of others in 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nning from 2001 to 2008 in the UK. Overall, women always had the largest sh...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...centage was seen in the year 2001. The chart shows that the total percentag...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...men followed a more incremental manner. After 2006, the next two years showed t...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Children
... percentage of women and men decreased. children percentage saw a rise till 2007 but fol...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88333333333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49059341434 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4969878425 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378353628413 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156776498333 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18470916741 0.0843802449381 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253862615392 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19515741194 0.0819641961636 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.