The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie chart illustrates the expenditure of schools situated in the UK over a period of 20 years spanning from 1981 to 2001.
Overall, the biggest part goes out to pay teachers’ salaries which sums up to around 40 to 50% whereas the lowest goes in the area of insurance. Additionally, furniture, books and salaries for other staffs make up the rest of the expenditure.
In 1981, teachers’ salaries made up 40% of the total spending, with books and furniture making up 30% together. salaries of other staffs added 28% more to the total along with a very low spending (2%) towards insurance. After 10 years, in 1991, teachers’ salaries and resources cost increased (10% and 5% respectively) whereas salaries for other staffs along with furniture cost dropped to 22% and 5% respectively. insurance cost also increased slightly by 1%.
However, in 2001, spending towards salaries (both teachers and staffs) and resources dropped a bit. But insurance cost increased to 8% from 3% as it was in 1991. The most dramatic increase was seen in case of furniture and equipment. it rose to 23% from just 5% within a span of 10 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Salaries
...s and furniture making up 30% together. salaries of other staffs added 28% more to the t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 423, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Insurance
...ost dropped to 22% and 5% respectively. insurance cost also increased slightly by 1%. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...een in case of furniture and equipment. it rose to 23% from just 5% within a span ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9378238342 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91621941679 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564766839378 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8641906838 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6363636364 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141161361978 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564292188768 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927314261793 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116652923736 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126849347663 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.