The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts depict data about the percentages of yearly expenditures varied in a school of UK during the selected years : 1981, 1991 and 2001.

On the whole, what can be clearly seen from the chart is that of giving budgets to lecturers was in the first place all over the whole sectors. In contrast, spending on other employee's salaries had been experiencing a dramatic fall , whereas the emphasis in insurance, which was marginally improving.

Regarding the expenditure in teachers' salaries, a half of the sector accounted for teachers in 1991, while this quota witnessed by a tenth drop in 1981 compared to 5% decrease in 2001. In terms of furniture and equipment sector, the school spent around a fifth of total grant on it , as opposed to resources , which was spent by 9% in 2001. Following this, expenditure in other workers' salaries plummeted by around 28% in 1981 from 22% to 15% in 1991 and 2001.

After that, spending rate in insurance saw a negligible increase around 1% between 1981 and 1991 , although there had been just slightly ahead of improving by approximately 5% in 2001.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es had been experiencing a dramatic fall , whereas the emphasis in insurance, whi...
^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dramatic fall , whereas the emphasis in insurance, which was marginally improvin...
^^
Line 9, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pent around a fifth of total grant on it , as opposed to resources , which was spe...
^^
Line 9, column 308, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...al grant on it , as opposed to resources , which was spent by 9% in 2001. Followin...
^^
Line 13, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...increase around 1% between 1981 and 1991 , although there had been just slightly a...
^^
Line 13, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y ahead of improving by approximately 5% in 2001.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the whole, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93085106383 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73052570483 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3455534728 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 5.23603664747 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186965893694 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832714305659 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639456574241 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116674313046 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690861517773 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.