The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The above figures compare the five essential expenses based on a British school in over a three different decades.
In one look, it could be obvious that the highest percentage of expenditure in this comparison belongs to the Teachers’ salaries. Also, the Insurance cost is located at the end of this ranking.
According to the pie graphs, the first school expenses is shown by Teachers’ salaries and its trend from 40% had a slight jump and in 2001 located at 45%. The striking exchange goes to Furniture & Equipment which has fluctuating manner from 1981 to 2001, 15% for former and 23% for later. It could be seen that in 1991 its rate was 5%.
On the other hand, in this period the lowest outcome with the smallest rise is Insurance. Furthermore, the Other workers’ salaries and Resources and Furniture had their ups and downs and their trends situated in the middle of this comparison between 1981 and 2001. However, Other workers’ salaries saw a big rise in 1991, its ratio in 2001 illustrated 15% of total spending.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os; salaries and Resources and Furniture had their ups and downs and their trends...
^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1. However, Other workers' salaries saw a big rise in 1991, its ratio in 200...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91525423729 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80208139495 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61581920904 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8078907886 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110235436766 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419490939507 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025892559457 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610247909152 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258035657449 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.