The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The two maps illustrate on how one could access the city hospital in 2007 compared to 2010.
Overall, the ring road alongside the hospital remained same as before. However, some new car parking places were added in the area in 2010. other than that, everything remained same except some location changes.
To reach the city hospital in 2007, one had to go across the city road towards north following the hospital road. This was changed in 2010 as there was a roundabout added in place of the junction connecting hospital and city road. To get to the main entrance of the hospital, one had to pass another roundabout at the other side of the hospital road. The bus station was also moved closer to the hospital road in 2010. It had a two way access from both the roundabouts so that people could move easier.
In 2007, both staffs and regular public used the area situated in the south western corner for car parking. Later in 2010, these places were renovated and divided into two individual spots. public car parking was moved towards the north-east corner, whereas, the previously allocated area remained for staff car parking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
... places were added in the area in 2010. other than that, everything remained same exc...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Public
... and divided into two individual spots. public car parking was moved towards the north...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84693877551 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3192241159 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8555866237 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.1666666667 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242897626584 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980564420769 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844348843478 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161473335233 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109732610897 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.