The charts below shows what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008
The given two charts illustrate the activities (part-time work, voluntary work, further study, unemployment) for the year 2008 of UK graduates, who did not start any full-time work after passing from instituitons.
Firstly, in case of graduate students, part-time work and unemployment are the median of choices among the four. With respect to, further study and voluntary work that are most and least chosen respectively by students, both part-time and unemployment have students above 16,000 and less than 18,000 in each category.
Secondly, for post graduate students, unlike graduate students the ranking among the four categories goes by further study, part-time work, unemployment and then voluntary work. But, in this case, the number of students in further study and part-time work are close, which is 2,725 and 2,535 respectively. This leaves unemployment to 1,625 students followed by the least amount of 345 student in voluntary work.
Overall, the number of both graduates and post-graduates enrolling for higher studies is maximum, accounting for slightly above 32,000 students in total. On the contrary, students preferred least doing voluntary work, which is slightly under a total of 4,000 students.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'student' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'students'.
Suggestion: students
...nts followed by the least amount of 345 student in voluntary work. Overall, the num...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'preferred the least'.
Suggestion: preferred the least
...nts in total. On the contrary, students preferred least doing voluntary work, which is slightly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, then, on the contrary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58602150538 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82126953676 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7930191742 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255125491497 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123844088374 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781279877595 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171046907507 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908336935633 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'student' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'students'.
Suggestion: students
...nts followed by the least amount of 345 student in voluntary work. Overall, the num...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'preferred the least'.
Suggestion: preferred the least
...nts in total. On the contrary, students preferred least doing voluntary work, which is slightly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, then, on the contrary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58602150538 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82126953676 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7930191742 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255125491497 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123844088374 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781279877595 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171046907507 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908336935633 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.