The bar charts illustrate the information about two genres of TV shows watched by two gender and people of four different age groups of Australia.
Overall, It shows that maximum number of females and people from different age groups loved to watch reality shows as compared to those who watched game shows. However, males as well as people from different age groups who were above 45 years in age loved and enjoyed watching game shows but people who were 25 to 34 years old showed less interest in sport shows.
There were 70% of females who loved watching reality shows whereas, almost 62% of males did not like watching it. It represent that people of different age groups were also interested in watching these shows. We can see the increase of ratio according to people from different ages. Above 50% of younger people who were 16 to 25 years old enjoyed this show, whereas 60% people who were 25 to 34 years of age also loved these type of shows. While, almost 68% of people who were 35 to 44 years old showed rapid interest in reality shows. Also people above 45 years old had almost reached to the same ratio of women which was almost 70% who watched these shows by showing similar interest.
The game show was watched by both the gender and also people from different age groups. It shows that almost 61% males enjoyed watching sport shows whereas, females who watched game shows decreased by 1%. Also, almost 51% people who were 16 to 25 years old loved watching sport related shows but people who were 25 to 34 years of age did not like watching the game shows which showed decrease in their interest by almost 39%. While, people who were 35 to 44 years old showed slight interest in game shows by almost 3%. It can be seen that people who were above 45 years old showed higher interest in watching game shows which was 70% and is similar to women who loved watching reality shows. Moreover, we can see that reality shows have maximum viewers in comparison to people who like game shows.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hows watched by two gender and people of four different age groups of Australia. ...
^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'represents'?
Suggestion: represents
...% of males did not like watching it. It represent that people of different age groups wer...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of age also loved these type of shows. While, almost 68% of people who were 35 to 44...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...showed rapid interest in reality shows. Also people above 45 years old had almost re...
^^^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...crease in their interest by almost 39%. While, people who were 35 to 44 years old sho...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 3.15609756098 729% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 965.302439024 171% => OK
No of words: 360.0 196.424390244 183% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57777777778 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07316779141 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.333333333333 0.547539520022 61% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 283.868780488 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8203482263 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.866666667 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161509695108 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100333110564 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139503524422 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220731749359 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.211571954892 0.0819641961636 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.