The charts show information about the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided charts compare the proportion of male and female employees of the age group ranging from 60 to 64 in four different countries: Belgium, the USA, Japan and Indonesia between the year 1970 and 2000.
An initial impression from the charts is that the proportion of employed men was higher than that of women in every country and over the period. During the studied period, the USA always had the highest percentage of employees.
A closer insight into the first chart reveals that in 1970, the USA had the highest proportion of male employees at about 85%, followed by Indonesia with just over 80%. The proportion of employed men in Belgium was nearly 80% and Japan ranked bottommost with over 75%. Similarly, the USA still led the chart with the highest proportion of female employees at nearly 80%, while that of Indonessia and Belgium was quite similar, just over 60%. In contrast, Japan had only 55% employed women.
A quite different picture can be seen in the second chart. In terms of male employees, the USA and Indonesia was the leaders with a considerable decrease over the 30-year period to 79% and 71% respectively, while Japan and Belgium shared the same proportion of just over 50%. There was an enormous change in the ranking of the percentage of employed women between 4 countries with Indonesia came first with 50% and Japan was its nearest competitor. The USA ranked third with 40%. Finally, Belgium showed a huge discrepancy with its opponents with the proportion of under 10%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, similarly, still, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89883268482 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53871296397 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494163424125 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2254485942 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.916666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131324178155 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584367949118 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458884374068 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104376951524 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376524691064 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.