The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the proportion of men and women of four countries between the age of 60 and 64 who participated in the workforce in two specific years, 1970 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that there were more senior citizens working in 1970 compared to 2000. Moreover, the rates of men were always higher than those of women across the four given countries.
In 1970, the percentages of working males and females aged between 60 and 64 in the USA was seen to be the highest, at 86% and 76% respectively. This was closely followed by Indonesia (84% for men and 65% for women), and Belgium (79% for men and 63% for women). Japanese working people who were in the 60 to 64 sector ranked last, at 76% men and 56% women.
In 2000, Belgium experienced dramatic drops in the figures for both genders, especially female ones, and became the country with the lowest proportion for men (52%) and women (8%). Men in the USA, Japan and Indonesia all reduced to 78%, 63% and 74%, in turn, while for women, the percentage varied between 45% and 50%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'sector' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sectors'.
Suggestion: sectors
...working people who were in the 60 to 64 sector ranked last, at 76% men and 56% women. ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast, at 76% men and 56% women. In 2000, Belgium experienced dramatic drops in th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52380952381 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40280390134 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566137566138 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0149114038 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290571927634 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13817888863 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769183501047 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197093100071 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777517253236 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.