The pie charts present the percentage for each form of transport to one university in comparison between the year 2004 and 2009.
Overall, the most favourable methods of travel were Bus and Car as the two take total over 70% in both surveyed years.
In 2004, according to the first chart, Car took the majority of choices made with over 50% of the methods. Followed by that was the number 33% of Bus. Meanwhile, other three were only accounted for less than 20% out of the total.
By the year 2009, as a result of extra fees for car parking in 2006, there was a decline in proportion of travelers using car to less than 30%. On the contrary, new bus stop in the university in 2008 gives a boost to the amount of Bus options to just under a half of the pie chart, surpassed the Car. Though there was a slight increase, the least popular selections were still Train and Walking with around 5% for each. The Bicycle’s record had risen to nearly double compared to 2004.
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant 56
- It has been observed that in many countries there are not enough students choosing to study science subjects at university. What do you think are causes of the problem? Are there any effects on society? 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee. 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 378, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'trained'.
Suggestion: Trained
...the least popular selections were still Train and Walking with around 5% for each. Th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, still, while, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48044692737 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3652604723 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625698324022 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4577035412 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1111111111 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141623052499 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561678961819 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649398900033 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100868914481 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760102273592 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.