The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012.
The charts give information about the tuition fee which students have to pay by genders and the proportion of degree and diploma qualifications in tertiary education in Singapore between 2000 and 2012.
Overall, the expense on school which was spent by the male students was higher than that of the female ones during the 2000-2012 period. In addition, the percentage of diploma qualifications was higher than that of degree qualifications.
In 2000, nearly 10 million dollars of tuition expenditure was contributed by boys, which was higher than that of girls, at only roughly 7 million dollars. After 4 years, boys spent exactly 20 million dollars on their school compared to around 12 million dollars of girls. The increasing trend consistently continued to 2012, when the amount of school expenditure reached over 30 million dollars for males and exactly 20 million dollars for females.
In terms of the proportion of qualifications by distinct types, while Singapore had only 27% of qualifications was degree in 2000, the percentage of diploma was 73%. After 12 years, the figure of degree in Singapore had an increase to 32%, which was still lower than that of diploma, at 68%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14948453608 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87318773835 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4322187413 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280691736389 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136033532053 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851359698824 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196939777208 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870357814552 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.