The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts illustrate the percentage of the electricity is manufactured by four countries ( India, Sweden, Morocco, and Vietnam ) from 2003 to 2008.
At first glance, it is clear that the resource of fossil fuel is produced by Vietnam and Indian. Whereas, hydropower is the principal source of the electricity in Sweden and Morocco.
In term of Indian and Vietnam, the rate of fossil fuel accounted at 56 % and 82% respectively, while 44% hydropower is produced in Vietnam, this percentage is larger than 14% in India. Unfortunately, Vietnam did not have conditions to manufacture nuclear power, whereas Indian recorded a small minority of electricity produced from this sources.
In Morocco, the overwhelming majority sources are hydropower, which dominated at 95%. However, the rate of hydropower produced just over fifth and having the advantage to manufacture significantly nuclear power ( 44% ). Both Morocco and Sweden have a very small percentage of fossil fuel resource.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ricity is manufactured by four countries India, Sweden, Morocco, and Vietnam fro...
^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies India, Sweden, Morocco, and Vietnam from 2003 to 2008. At first glance, it...
^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...l minority of electricity produced from this sources. In Morocco, the overwhelming...
^^^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... manufacture significantly nuclear power 44% . Both Morocco and Sweden have a ver...
^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...facture significantly nuclear power 44% . Both Morocco and Sweden have a very sma...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44370860927 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07424468645 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6928375159 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115271096128 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591591075994 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537619134483 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915102286214 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564890724241 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.