The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart illustrates the percentage of 3 sources of electricity provided including fossil fuel, hydropower and nuclear power in 4 different countries namely: India, Sweden, Morocco and Vietnam over the course of 5 years starting in 2003.
Overall, it is obviously seen that there was not any nuclear power used in Vietnam and India in the period shown. While hydropower was the most popular source of electricity of Sweden and Morocco, Vietnam and India tend to consume more fossil fuel than other types.
In details, in term of nuclear power, Sweden registered the data of 44 percent, bearing such a dramatic difference with India standing at just 4 percent. Meanwhile, the amount of fossil fuel was highest in India with 82 percent, following by Vietnam accounted for more than half of total energy. An opposite tense can be observed in Sweden and Morocco with 4 percent and 5 percent respectively.
More significant, the most consumption of electricity generated by hydropower belonged to Morocco, which is about twice as much as Vietnam’s. This figure also just made up 14 percent of the entire amount of electricity provided in India.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16315789474 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82480602624 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3195253175 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0645212624148 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310902844882 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417722555374 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531376034695 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467256727596 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.