The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares pineapple produce transported (by tonnes) abroad in three different countries between two years 2009 and 2019. The pie chart shows what expenditures contributed to the price for each pineapple sold.
In terms of regional exports, country A experienced an explosive increase. After 10 years, the value rose from approximately 1 ton to more than 10 tonnes. Following the similar trend, the figure for country C doubled; however, the amount was insignificant. Conversely, pineapple export in country B leveled off from about 4.2 tonnes to just under 2 tonnes.
Regarding the pineapple cost per product, it is clear that expenses on selling points accounted for more than a third, which was also the largest spend. Meanwhile, producing and export cost were tiny, whose proportions were 5 per cent and 4 per cent, respectively.
Overall, after a decade, country A took the first place of country B in pineapple export on account of a remarkable climb. Meanwhile, the majority of money spent on a pineapple was for selling the product, whereas the production step took the minority.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to the price for each pineapple sold. In terms of regional exports, country A ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, regarding, so, third, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15083798883 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88372074293 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648044692737 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8254066072 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289836787768 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10856903618 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085783741983 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176318876094 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101110637466 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.