Some cites have few controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings. People think that they should be free to choose the design they like. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is an argument that the government should give people freedom in decision of designs for their buildings. While there are several benefits, I believe the advantages of this development cannot outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, freedom in choosing construction schemes would allow initiatives to be taken into practice. Firstly, the high-rise constructions with special structures can be used to convey the messages of companies who own them. For example, a company relating to arts and crafts might construct its base to resemble the combination of abstractionism shapes, which would immediately evoke thoughts of artistic elements whenever people look at the building. An elaborately-designed construction can also illustrate the exceptional talent of the architect that generated the original idea on paper.
On the other hand, however, there are negative consequences when giving a totally free right to sketch up a house. The most apparent disadvantage is that some people, with lacks of understanding about structural design, can create possibly dangerous constructions. For instance, so-called ‘Vietnamese Pisa towers’ are houses or buildings that are thin but very tall, therefore make themselves weak structures and incline slightly overtime. At a moment, the whole building would collapse, threatening human life. Additionally, some skyscrappers, despite having good-looking appearances, might pollute the environment via their construction process, by using environmentally unfriendly matterial or by loaf of exhausted fumes.
In conclusion, in my point of view, freedom in choosing layouts for residential houses and business offices is indeed beneficial for the enterprises and the house owners. However, it would lead to many harmful outcomes to both residents and the environment. Consequently, the advantages cannot outweigh the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is an argument that the government...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92673992674 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36035419308 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681318681319 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7211821363 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199617964475 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595446821281 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306314620675 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11183226594 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106875543939 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.