Some cites have few controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings. People think that they should be free to choose the design they like. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is an argument that the government should give people freedom in decision of designs for their buildings. While there are several benefits, I believe the advantages of this development cannot outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, freedom in choosing construction schemes would allow initiatives to be taken into practice. Firstly, the high-rise constructions with special structures can be used to convey the messages of companies who own them. For example, a company relating to arts and crafts might construct its base to resemble the combination of abstractionism shapes, which would immediately evoke thoughts of artistic elements whenever people look at the building. An elaborately-designed construction can also illustrate the exceptional talent of the architect that generated the original idea on paper.
On the other hand, however, there are negative consequences when giving a totally free right to sketch up a house. The most apparent disadvantage is that some people, with lacks of understanding about structural design, can create possibly dangerous constructions. For instance, so-called ‘Vietnamese Pisa towers’ are houses or buildings that are thin but very tall, therefore make themselves weak structures and incline slightly overtime. At a moment, the whole building would collapse, threatening human life. Additionally, some skyscrappers, despite having good-looking appearances, might pollute the environment via their construction process, by using environmentally unfriendly matterial or by loaf of exhausted fumes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 225.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93777777778 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36349025072 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.724444444444 0.561755894193 129% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5930616731 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.454545455 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183552932432 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601475862862 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272435633809 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116742565484 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00747357068306 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.