The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

This bar chart gives information about the different weight measurement for citizen who lives in Charlestown between 1955 and 2015. This information divides into 5 different categories from 20 to 69 years old and there are 4 indicators of weight measurements.

In 1995, the younger age start from 20 to 39 years old were not having any crucial weight issue, the biggest issue was overweight. However, above 40 years old had a new problem there was obses. In general, more than 50 percent society per category had ideal weight. As we can see, the differences for underweight from age 20 to 49 decreased and after year 50 increased, this issue was contrary with overweight percent in different groups.

5 decades later, aged people gain obese and few of them still maintained their ideal weight. For younger people, more than 50 percent of them still concern about their body weight, nevertheless, older citizens did not maintain their weight, so they became obese. Only a few of them were overweight and less than 20 percent of each category was underweight.

In summary, people in 2015 less concerned about their weight, therefore, more people gained obese and overweight. In the future, the percentage of overweight and obese will increase and few of them still consider about the weight measure.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decreased' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decreases'.
Suggestion: decreases
...ences for underweight from age 20 to 49 decreased and after year 50 increased, this issue...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, in general, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0787037037 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66579444969 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.844808677 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128387768905 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601446066719 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756513877296 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980660025752 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073734149503 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.