The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar charts provide data of a research into weight issues taken among Charles town residents in 1995 and in 2015.
Overall, the majority of people taken survey in 1995 have an ideal weight while a significant candidates in 2015 had to face excessive weight gain and obesity.
In 1995, according to the data, people having perfect weight came first in all age groups. Youngest class had the highest percentage for this statistic. Additionally, there was a growing tendency in obesity over ages. 50-59 years old group had the most overweight and obese people, which accounted for about 10% each. However, the proportion of fat and obesity people stand in just a tiny percentage over the chart. Underweight citizens in Charles town also accounted for a remarkable number in this year.
20 years after, in contrast to 1995, number of candidates suffering in obesity increased rapidly over ages. Especially, in senior category and elder age group, the proportions for this weight issue were more than 50% and precisely 60% respectively. Beside, there was still an exception. The percentage of youngster candidates having ideal body in this group remained unchanged through years, which was approximate 70%, in both years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
The given bar charts provide data of a research into weight issues taken among Charles ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 92, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Youngest'.
Suggestion: The Youngest
...ct weight came first in all age groups. Youngest class had the highest percentage for th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41708542714 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64553655523 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613065326633 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.043920855 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8333333333 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0817492497572 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301428001675 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395314138222 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645359722379 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356997170536 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.