The charys below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting anf reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charys below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.

Summarise the information by selecting anf reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate the proportion of water used for three different purposes in six areas of the world.

In overall, while Europe uses over half of its water for industries, Central Asia uses up to 88% of water for agricultural works.

As mentioned before, European consume 53% of water for industrial use, followed by North American with 5% less than the former one. By contrast, Central Asia only use 5% of water for industries as water is mostly used for agriculture. According to the given charts, we can see that only North America and Europe consume water for agricultural use less than 40%, in constrast to other four areas of the world.

In addition, South America is where use up to nearly two fifths of water for domestic use. Two areas of Asia appearing in the charts consume the same percentage of water for national usage at 7 %.

In conclusion, apart from Europe and North America, other areas focus on using water for agricultural use as the proportion of used water ranging from 71% to 88%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, apart from, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79096045198 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54300221095 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6213232847 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281994781843 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162554792721 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617719553341 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198781478594 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572338791537 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.