The chat below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2015 and future projection of 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chat below gives information about Southland’s main exports in 2000, 2015 and future projection of 2025.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram given shows Southlands core exports values in 2000, the current year and predictions for 2025.
Overall, the value of international tourism has been risen in this 3 years. It also true that meat products value is the smallest in comparison with other sector values.
In terms of the international tourism, in 2000, the export value was a little more than 8 billion pounds. This value has been rising to nearly 9 billion in this recent year. 10 billion pounds is the figure that is predicted for this sector in 2025. While in 2000, there was approximately 7 billion pounds by exporting dairy products, it has been increasing significantly to 10 billion in this year. However, they estimate that there will be a small fall to 9.5 billion in this sector export value.
When it comes to meat products, Southland witnesses the values fell from 6 billion in 2000 to 5.5 billion in current year. In 2025, it is anticipated that the figure will drop to the 5 billion pounds.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...has been risen in this 3 years. It also true that meat products value is the smalles...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76608187135 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6038434446 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.088171371 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0823035241193 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412686787441 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327640963044 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643342105683 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362546336211 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.