The data detail information about of the ages stage of populations between Yemen and Italy, in 2000 and projections for 2050.

Essay topics:

The data detail information about of the ages stage of populations between Yemen and Italy, in 2000 and projections for 2050.

The charts describe information of the ages of the population between two countries, Yemen and Italy, in 2000 and projections for 2050. There is three phases ages will be reported in this data. The explanation of the chart will be generated.
First, from this chart seen that percentage of age of population has almost similar type as people who are in 60+ years old in 2000 was a minor population and so do it in projection, 2050 but in different number, 3.6% in 2000 and 5.7% in projection 2050. Whilst in Italy, the minor population was people who are in 0-14 years in 2000. The experts also have same research in projection 2050 about population that minor in Italy. But, compare with Yemen in 2000, people who are in 0-14 years was very dominant population, over 50%. In addition, about people who are in 15-59 years in Yemen and Italy, the percentage of population is included in dominant level, except in Yemen, 2000. The difference number of percentage was over 15% in 2000, Italy has bigger number than Yemen and is 11.1% in 2015, Yemen has bigger number than Italy.
To sum up, Italy in 2000 and Italy in 2050 has same type percentage of population. In the first dominant position, there are people who are in 15-59 years, the second, are 60+ years and the last are 0-14 years. While Yemen, people who are in 15-59 years and are in 60+ years, is in opposite position in 2000 and in 2050.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 362, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'researched'.
Suggestion: researched
...ars in 2000. The experts also have same research in projection 2050 about population tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'typed'.
Suggestion: typed
...taly in 2000 and Italy in 2050 has same type percentage of population. In the first ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, in addition, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55555555556 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39924192277 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424603174603 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8509434374 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3753899787 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159717515033 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143813773187 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262781181376 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124106832098 0.0819641961636 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.