Development plan for Islip Town Centre
The supplied figures depict information about renewal small city sketch named Islip. The comparative also provides a peak progress of various buildings arrangement like shops and housing. Obviously, further description will be state here.
The first picture showcases the current circumstance of Islip which is an empty land. We can see closely that just allocation for markets, school, courtyard, and house holding. By the same token, every region possesses those own streets. Behind the centre town, countryside is present there. Hence, in the future plan, there will be huge different throughout extinction method.
On the other hand, reconstruction of Islip is scheduled steeply. Unexpectedly, the planner turns every detail place become the new world. Moreover, there are plenty added facilitation are delivered to comfy the holder. In more detail, the road will be extent by surrounding the centre point. Similarly, pedestrian will be easier to walk because of special access. Equally important, the development noticing the bus station, car park, and dividing housing. Those all support the upgrade view of the little city.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'peak progress'.
Suggestion: peak progress
...ed Islip. The comparative also provides a peak progress of various buildings arrangement like s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...lso provides a peak progress of various buildings arrangement like shops and housing. Obv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...sier to walk because of special access. Equally important, the development noticing the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, moreover, similarly, so, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57803468208 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74455103668 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.768786127168 0.547539520022 140% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.2116914101 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.3333333333 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.5333333333 22.9334400587 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204384052857 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471988301128 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544510151962 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111885167185 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684491076237 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.9 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.