The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The below line graph depicts the details about the number of packages distributed by two most important mail service companies for 8 consecutive decades starting from the year 1920 to 2000.
Overall, It was noticed that maximum number of packets were allotted by Federal Express. However, this trend didn’t survived for too long, when TNT surpassed Federal Express in mid 1986.
It was observed in the year 1920, that almost thrice the number of packs were distributed by federal express as compared to TNT, which was just slightly above 5000. In 1940, there was huge increase in the items delivered by federal express it was around 24000, at that moment it was at peak level. Similarly, with TNT minimal increment was noted approximately 7500 items was distributed. In 1950, federal express fell down close to 11,500 as compared to previous decade. In contrast, with TNT there was a small growth of about 8000.
From 1970, federal express showed an upsurge in their shipments and after a decade it was about 19000. Moreover, it remained unchanged for almost 2 decades. Ultimately, in mid 1986; TNT overtook federal express and their distribution showed approximately 22,500. Furthermore, in the year 2000 again there was moderate growth it was just slightly below 25000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'didn't' requires base form of this verb: 'survive'
Suggestion: survive
...ral Express. However, this trend didn’t survived for too long, when TNT surpassed Federa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, similarly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13875598086 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5803983455 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588516746411 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7766646078 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0956854045747 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403818407233 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065951584587 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878268521226 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933048107394 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.